User:Daltonanderson1002/Cliona celata/Mn07869 Peer Review

General info
Daltonanderson1002, Darciebailey1, Jd29773, Kbgsu25, Kyrabiggins
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daltonanderson1002/Cliona_celata?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Cliona celata

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead of the article has no information and needs to be expanded upon. The content seems to outline Cline celata well and is on course with the needed information. There is also no bias presented in the article. There are reliable sources for the information with link that work. Some sections have not been added to the current article at the moment, so it is difficult to distinguish how the information will flow once placed in the article. Some of the articles in the sandbox seem out of order compared to normal wikipedia articles. The organization is slightly difficult to follow, and only one image is included. Overall, the article describes the organism well with the information provided, but could be improved upon in organization and an addition of a few topics.