User:Damianperea31/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Ainu language

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because it is an endagered langauge that I want to learn about and it relates to my Japanese studies major. My first impressions are that the article is well written.

Evaluate the article
The lead of the page does give a sentence that introduces the topic. However, the lead does not include a brief introduction of the major sections, and has information that cannot be found late in the page. The article has a neutral tone with no one view point overly represented. The content is all relevant to the topic and seems to be up-to-date. Some of the facts do not have a source. Some of the links are outdated. Most of the sources already use are reliable, and their links work. The topic is about historically underrepresented topics. The writing of the article is clear and concise with few grammatical errors. All the sections are well divided as well. No images, but it does have a sound file. Most of the conversation in the Talk page is about whether this page should be merged with the Ainu languages page.