User:Dan-is-gniess/Ore Shoot/Ryan-is-Gneiss Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Dan-is-gniess)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Dan-is-gniess/Ore Shoot

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?                                             no
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?                                                  No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?                                                          No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?                                                                                                not overly detailed

Lead evaluation
Lead is short but gives a good and easy way to understand the topic

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?                                                                                                    Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?                                                                                                                   Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?                                                                  No missing  or extra content

Content evaluation
It isn't a popular topic with not a lot known on it so it doesn't have too much content but all the content is factual and relevant. There could probably be a history section added if there is enough information for it.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?                                                                                                                          Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?                                               Yes
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?                                                            No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?       No

Tone and balance evaluation
No real bias or opinion stated in the paper as it is mostly factual and scientific.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?                                                 Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?                                       Yes
 * Are the sources current?                                                                                                                                  Relevant enough
 * Check a few links. Do they work?                                                                                                                     Yes

Sources and references evaluation
Could probably use some more but there is enough and they are all working and relevant. Citation should probably be put sooner in the paragraph as there is information there that has only been sited at the end of the paragraph

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?                                                    Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?                                                                    Not that I found
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Organization evaluation
It is well organised page but short so not many options for improvement or change.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media                                                                                    No images


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
No images so maybe add one showing what an ore shoot looks like in the ground.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?        Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added?                                                                                             It has added a lot more comprehensive information on the topic
 * How can the content added be improved?                                                                                                   Better phrased in a more concise manner

Overall evaluation
It is a good page improvement that doesn't not have many faults with no bias and good organization. There can be improvement though on the writing style to make it more direct and easy to understand but isn't an urgent need for improvement. It could probably benefit from a photo or visual diagram to better help the reader understand what a ore shoot is. There is definitely a bit more that can be added if desired and the lead could probably represent the two categories in the article.