User:DanDurbz/Blue-lined octopus/Alyssabaldwin222 Peer Review

General info
DanDurbz
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:DanDurbz/Blue-lined octopus
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Blue-lined octopus

Lead

 * Peer nicely updated introductory paragraphs to make it more accurate & informative.
 * Lead is concise, but contain's information not mentioned in later sections of the article.

Content

 * All updated content makes information more accurate, informative, and reliable. Gives details to paragraphs that were previously vague, & adds more accurate distribution information.
 * Content is up-to-date, located in more recent research (2004-2008).
 * Could create a new section based on 'Characteristics' or 'Description' to move most of the current & drafted information from the lead to a concise category.

Tone & Balance

 * Content added was neutral. Doesn't lean into any particular bias and addresses controversies with open language.

Sources & References

 * Sources are up-to-date, occurring in more recent years (2004-2008).
 * Links work & represent multiple host sites/authors.
 * Could try to find even more recent research for further information (2008-2023).
 * Added three new peer-reviewed sources.

Organization

 * Content is well-organized, well-written, and concise.