User:DanLingRam/sandbox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deponent_verb

a.	What is the level of importance assigned to the topic? What is the class-level of the article, and what reason(s) did you find for that “grade?” The article has a level of importance that may not be as high because it still does not contain enough information. The Class-level is still not yet available and by the looks of it still needs some work to be done in order to be gradable.

b.	Is there a focus for the comments, or are there several? What are the issues that the comments address? In the Article, the main focus in the comments is to provide feedback on what else is there to fix as well as to add. Since there is still quite some things that need to be added in order to make it perfect from what I was looking at it I found it that there are some explanations to be done on passives and active verbs which are mentioned but not well explained.

c.	Select two of the issues, and summarize the discussions. How does the discussion relate to what you have learned, or feel you know about the issue? Is there resolution? How does the language on the actual page relate to the talk about it? From the issues that I see in the articles talk page is how they are giving feedback on how it does not go over the specifics to fully understand the meaning of deponent verbs. The only issue I see is that they don’t provide examples or at least explain enough.

d.	How do the article and discussion relate to our treatment of the topic—in our reading and in our discussion? Did we address it at all? If so, did we do so in ways consistent with the understanding in the article or the talk page? You may find agreement with some of the discussants and disagreement with others. After reading all the discussions I do see and agree with the discussants because they bring up really good points. They also bring up some really good ideas and possible examples that can be implemented. But they may first need to be looked over to make it a more valuable point.

e.	What is your sense of the discussion? In other words, what do you conclude is most convincing or explanatory? Why? (i.e., what reasoning led you to draw the conclusion you have drawn?) Finally, after looking at the discussion I can conclude that the conclusion is convincing since it has really good points pointed out as well as potential examples. The reason for this conclusion is due to the fact that the article does not have much information that all the comments are really helpful to develop a better article with more helpful examples.