User:Dancer811/Glycerophospholipid/Ejgclemson Peer Review

Lead

- The lead of the glycerophospholipid article is very well written and concise. It definitely gives a clear definition of the subject of the article and introduces it well.

- It does not really outline all of the information/major sections of the article although there are a lot of them so that would be difficult to fit in and to keep them concise. It could potentially include an extra sentence to address the uses and examples that are present in the latter two sections of the article.

Content

- All of the content in the article is certainly relevant and does appear to be up-to-date; it also does not seem like there is anything missing or anything that doesn't belong, because it is all very detailed and relevant. However, glycerophospholipids are certainly a comprehensive topic and so there is likely still information that can be added there.

- The article doesn't however deal with an equity gap or address a topic related to historically underrepresented populations as it is not a biography. That would not be something that could really be fixed for the article, as glycerophospholipids are simply a scientific topic that cannot really be tied to an equity gap.

Tone and Balance

- The article is all very neutrally written, although it deals with a topic that would not necessarily have two polarizing positions or room for bias so I don't think that was ever much of a concern.

Sources and References

- The sources used are credible and recent, so they are good additions to the article. I think they were used well and new information is decently supported by the sources.

Organization

- I really liked the organization of the article and there were no super long passages that needed to be broken up and all of the sections/subsections were well grouped and made sense. I don't have any suggestions for this category.

Images and Media

- There is one image present in the article and it is definitely a relevant and helpful addition to describing the structures of glycerophospholipids. The caption to the image is also clearly written and a good explanation in interpreting the image. The image does adhere to wikipedia copyright regulations.

- My only suggestions would be possibly moving the image downwards in the article slightly so that it aligns better with the section it corresponds to (structure of glycerophospholipids), and I do think more images could be effective particularly in helping demonstrate the examples and uses sections of the article.

Overall Impressions

- I definitely think the added content to the article helped it to be more complete and it was well organized to be more clear and concise with a good overall flow. I don't think there are any major issues or suggestions to improve the article, I think it was all very well done.

General info
Dancer811
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dancer811/Glycerophospholipid/Bibliography&oldid=1187424041
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glycerophospholipid&oldid=1187470234

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)