User:Dancer811/Peripheral membrane protein/Everdin26 Peer Review

General info
Dancer811
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Peripheral membrane protein
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Peripheral membrane protein

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes, the lead seems to have included all of the content mentioned in the article, but at this time I cannot see any of the new content added by my peer.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * For the most part yes, however there are many sections in this article, and it does not look like everyone of them is mentioned in the lead. However, in general, I believe the lead provides a good background for the article.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No, information in the lead is is expanded in the following sections
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Concise and covers the main points regarding peripheral membrane proteins

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Currently, there is no new added content, however all of the content in this version seems relevant to the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * No content has been added at this time, but the rest of the content seems up to date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * There do not seem to be any viewpoints overrepresented or underrepresented.
 * in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * No new content. However, all of the existing data seems to be supported by reliable sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * For the most part the sources seem thorough and reflect the topic very well.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Most of the existing sources seem a little dated (early 2000s), however all of the information seems correct/current.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes the links work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes the content in the article seems concise, clear, and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * None seen
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * It is slightly hard to follow the flow of this article with all of the charts and sub-sections, however, this is likely to the amount of information that is present in this article. I would not organize it any other way, thus, I would say it is fairly well-organized.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * N/A

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * There was no content added by my peer at this time, however all of the content present seems to be good quality.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The strength of the current article would be the amount of description/detail in each of the sections.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * I think that the flow could be improved slightly, and I also believe that some more pictures might help the readers understanding of this concept.