User:Dandelions-love-to-fly/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Cancer-related fatigue

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose to evaluate this article because the subject of cancer-related fatigue is what my group is presenting on during the semester. I wanted to read and learn more about the topic so that I could have a little more background information on the subject. At first glance of the article I noticed that it was kind of short and while it did have a lot of good information I think it could be a little more in depth.

Evaluate the article
The article does have a clear lead in the introductory paragraph that states that cancer-fatigue can be experienced by people that are diagnosed with cancer. It contains links that take you to the definition of cancer and fatigue. The introduction doesn't state a brief description of what sections are, it just talks about fatigue being a side effect. The lead does only include information that is relevant and present in the rest of the article. The lead does need a little bit more information, it is very short and doesn't include what is in the rest of the article. Some of the references can be dated back to 2010 but the most recent one was 2023, so the information contained in the article is up to date. I noticed the last 3 most recent references were all of the same author, I think a more diverse range of authors could help to back up the facts of the article. The article could have contained more information in some of the sections. I noticed that the section titled screening only gives the reader only a little information that doesn't really answer all of the questions that someone who is interested in the article would have. The article is neutral, it only contains factual information and does not contain any biases that would persuade the reader to certain conclusions. The writing style used in the article is very clear and well written. It doesn't contain any grammatically errors and has good flow within each paragraph. The article doesn't contain any pictures, a picture could be included to make the reader understand what cancer-related fatigue can look like. The Talk page only has one comment, it is a link that leads to another article about cancer-related fatigue. There are no other comments, however the article posted is more detailed about cancer-related fatigue. I believe while this article does have a lot of factual information, it could be a little more detailed. The article feels like it only reaches the surface of cancer-related fatigue and doesn't make a deep dive into the facts. Also, a picture would really improve the articles quality. I think this article could definitely use some improvement.