User:DaniSlice/sandbox

= Week 6 Assignment "Peer Review" = Ifugao (Peer Reviewed: Perhaps adding more information on the archaeological implications of carbon dating that suggest the site being built later would help readers to understand if later means later in BC or AD. This article is heavily geared towards a historical approach rather than anthropological approach, so including more about the Ifugao people and customs associated with this region would be beneficial. The entire section on “Rice Culture” does not cite a single source, so providing more sources and citations here will help this section to be considered sound. DaniSlice (talk) 22:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC))

Nusantao Maritime Trading and Communication Network (Peer Reviewed: The very first sentence needs a citation. The article suggest this theory is dominant but does not cite a source, which makes the statement appear biased and unfounded. Adding a credible source here will help make it a sound statement. Also a lot of the information is cited or at least put in parenthesis but no source at the end of the sentence, consider adding sources to these statements. More information on the history of the region, history of the Solheim, and an anthroplogical approach to understanding the people that were involved with this theory would be beneficial in understanding this article. Also, archaeological evidence should be provided to either support or deny the claims of Solheim.DaniSlice (talk) 22:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC) )

= Week 5 Assignment Critically evaluating Kalinga Ethnoarchaeological Project = Explaining what ethnoarchaeologically is would be helpful in understanding what the study is

Understanding about the pottery and how it relates to household and kinship relationships

Expanding on the new archaeology that The Project engaged in

= Week 4 Assignment Kalinga Ethnoarchaeological Project = Adding information about the climate would be helpful in understanding the production of pottery

History of the Kalinga Ethnoarchaeological Project