User:Daniazevedo02/Spotted hyena/Tlaforge Peer Review

General info
Daniazevedo02
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?

-       I thought the article does a great job in explaining the analysis that Burgener et al. found in his studies. The words choices used made the article very easy to read and understand.

What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?

-       I would suggest changing the closing sentence. I believe it sounds a little choppy with the second part of the sentence not really flowing as well as the rest of the paragraph.

What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

-       The article is great overall! I think just switching up the last sentence to make the flow of the paragraph at the end sound a little better could improve your article the most.

Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? If so, what?

-       Yes, I am going to make sure to make my sources that I cited be labeled as a number that goes back to a reference section. Right now, my articles are cited by in-text citations.

Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? Specifically, does the information they are adding to the article make sense where they are putting it?

-       Yes, the article is organized very well with information that flows very nicely. It helped me to understand the information. Also, I think the spot where this paragraph is being added is put in a great spot. It will add to the article in a positive way!

Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic?

-       The article has a great flow. I do not believe that there is anything off-topic or unnecessary within the article. I believe the information is very organized and straight to the point.

Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view?

-       The article does not give any bias in trying to convince the reader to think a certain way. The information stated is very factual and non-negotiable.

Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y."

-       There are no words or phrases that include a bias feeling. Everything within the article is neutral.

Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors?

-       Yes, all information that is stated is connected to a reliable source.

Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single point of view.

-       The statements that were made were referenced by two different sources, so the article had a balanced point of view.

Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately!

-       The article does a great job in citing the sources as well as including a reference section that is presented accurately.