User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/Academic Publishing in Europe 2012/Notes

For 2012, "the areas to watch include: Crowdfunding: Small donations can add up to decent funding for a focused project, and present unique outreach opportunities. In a field of shoestring budgets like paleontology, I see crowdfunding as a potentially important new trend. Article-level metrics and data set archival and citation: I've tied these two topics together because they reflect a major advance beyond the old journal-level metrics like Impact Factor. Neither topic is completely new, but I saw plenty of new tools at ScienceOnline that may move the discussions and usage of these metrics forward. Furthermore, there is still a long way to go for community buy-in."

Comments

 * 10.1371/journal.pone.000000: Many
 * 10.1371/journal.pone.0002075: 3
 * 10.1371/journal.pone.0013180: 21
 * 10.1371/journal.pone.0000418: 4
 * 10.1371/journal.pone.0018011: 22
 * 10.1371/journal.pone.0022730:19
 * 10.1371/journal.pone.0015591: 18
 * 10.1371/journal.pone.0008519:19
 * referee reports

Metrics

 * File-level metrics

Notes from the conference

 * PhD thesis of the future?
 * versioning
 * Springer Reference, "e-Ref"


 * brevity
 * wiki example
 * OWW

OAT
http://species-id.net/wiki/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/Open-Access-Tage_2011/Wiki_approach/Outlook

OSS 2011

 * User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/Open Science Summit 2011

Formatting

 * Faster-than-light neutrino anomaly

WiR

 * WikiProject Open Access
 * Partnerships of journals with Wikipedia
 * OAFD

Reuse

 * About two decades ago, access to the scholarly literature was basically by subscription only
 * Then came the arXive, BMC, PLoS, Creative Commons et al., and now both green and gold OA provide access to over 10% of the scholarly literature
 * Haank, Schimmer, Burgelman: Gold OA is the "theme of the time", "only the beginning"
 * Burgelman: "Open Access is just the beginning"
 * show "Open Research" video, mention integration with multimedia
 * validate "data and knowledge"
 * diagram n authors, n publications, n data, on millimetre paper?
 * mention copyright, RAW and that most presentations are not really ready for CC BY-NC-ND
 * Template:Cite data
 * Burgelman: "What are the platforms of the future?"
 * mention EoR
 * publishers should feature/ highlight some of their content
 * show YouTube videos?


 * With more and more materials being available under CC licenses, one can start thinking about reuse
 * -NC-licensed stuff is basically not reusable
 * Funders, please stop covering the (full) fees for -NC articles


 * CC BY and - to a lesser extent - CC BY-SA materials are really reusable
 * Example: Wikimedia

Other
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dung_beetle http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neoneurus_vesculus_ovipositing_in_workers_of_the_ant_Formica_cunicularia.ogv
 * composite figures
 * editable file formats
 * annotation
 * workflow tools, despite Deerk Haank's scepticisms
 * ORCID ID and http://www.scientistsdb.com/index.php?title=Main_Page
 * Dung beetles
 * Parasitic wasps
 * MAKE THE POINT of every presentation so far having been in a static format, no use of multimedia, so basically publishing at the level of interactivity that arxiv has allowed for more than two decades now
 * curation (Wikipedia)
 * machine readability
 * Wikidata


 * http://vimeo.com/33921915
 * REUSE: full talk by Kim Zwollo
 * http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/January_2012/Contents/Open_Access_report
 * Information overflow
 * evoke graphs of rising number of journals and articles
 * mention EoR


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Open_Access
 * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Committee/Areas_of_interest/Open-access_policy/Request_for_Information_on_Public_Access_to_Peer-Reviewed_Scholarly_Publications_Resulting_From_Federally_Funded_Research
 * http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OAFD
 * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedian_in_Residence_on_Open_Science
 * show baglama?


 * Build on the Living Reviews
 * Mention licensing


 * Mention SMW

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Smallest_organisms&action=historysubmit&diff=470880559&oldid=465925542 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Smallest_organisms&diff=cur&oldid=470880559

http://species-id.net/wiki/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/Open-Access-Tage_2011/Wiki_approach/Outlook http://species-id.net/wiki/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/Open-Access-Tage_2011/Wiki_approach/Reuse_of_OA_materials_on_Wikimedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-09-26/News_and_notes#Academic_journals_consider_partnering_with_Wikipedia

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OAFD http://www.livingreviews.org/
 * Main weakness: non-open license; limited in scope

Cite-o-mter Total impact direct linking 3D PDF

interaction - who knows what Paedophryne amauensis is?

NMR wiki