User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/Open Access in Poland 2012/Reuse of Open Access materials




 * openly licensed content can be reused
 * e.g. on blogs, wikis, in Open Educational Resources


 * BaGLAMa
 * Usage of files from OA sources across Wikimedia


 * How often are materials from different publishers reused on Wikimedia projects?
 * Wikipedia Cite-o-meter
 * PLoS

Ranking of publishers by citations of their DOI prefixes from the metadata pages of files on Wikimedia Commons (the media repository used by Wikipedia and its sister projects, data as of September 2011):

Similar rankings can be calculated for each Wikipedia, e.g. the English and Vietnamese ones:


 * Open Access File of the Day

The case of the tiny frogs

 * More detailed history of events.


 * January 12: en:Paedophryne amauensis started by en:User:Speciate. Traffic stats for January 2012.
 * Featured "In the news" on the Main page of the English (originally without image, later with) as well as - with image - Thai (WebCite) Wikipedia on January 12, 2012, less than 24 h after the taxonomic description had been published by Eric Rittmeter et al. in PLoS ONE. By that time, the respective entries in the Dutch, Finnish, Portuguese, Russian, French, Bulgarian, Hungarian, Thai, Spanish and German Wikipedias, at Wikispecies and Wikimedia Commons had all been started, too - with images imported from the paper. Since then, the Paedophryne amauensis articles in the respective languages have also been featured on the Main pages of the French, German, Chinese, Finnish and Norwegian Wikipedias.


 * Cross-linguistic impact
 * File-level metrics


 * Barriers to reuse
 * licensing
 * composite figures
 * non-editable file formats, especially PDF/ ZIP