User:Daniellablitz/Cameo appearance/Ggopher33 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Daniella Blitz, Monica Valdez-Ramos


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daniellablitz/Cameo_appearance?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Context: Everything you had in your article was relevant, and was discussed well within the themes.

Tone: The tone was very professional, no biases or anything stood out to me in what you wrote.

Sources: You had a lot of good sources. The only thing I would say is that you have to include at least a little about Stan Lee, even if he doesn't fit the criteria of being directors. Cameos were his thing.

Organization: Organization into separate people is good and makes the information digestible. Maybe try chronological too and see if there are any tends over time?

Overall: Article is very very strong. Anything to add would most likely be polishing up small details. Really good job.