User:Danimilkweed/Urban reforestation/WessNature Peer Review

In your first section, I would suggest separating the sentence- "Urban reforestation programs have been implemented in various countries around the world, but it has more notably been a success in wealthier areas and nations that continue to prove to be an environmental injustice."- into 2 separate ideas. I agree with you that including that wealthier countries contribute to more environmental injustice is important to add, however, I would separate it into two sentences here for better flow.

In the last sentence of the Benefits section, you have "Im" instead on "In."

Capitalize "This" in the second sentence of the Forte Lauderdale paragraph.

At the end of your case studies section, I would take out the whole India section and the East Asia section unless you plan to put in a similar amount of work as you did the Fort Lauderdale one. For sake of time, I would just making link some other studies from India or East Asia and say something like "and here are some global examples...." Especially for consistency, I would get rid of the indie section because the shortness of it compared to you other section makes it seem unfinished.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)