User:Danimo2021/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Feminine psychology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I thought it could tie in nicely to our class discussions on the political issues women usually favor. Upon reading, I also noticed that it is a fairly short article, which unquestionably showed me how Wikipedia itself is gendered. It is an interesting article since it showcases how everything, even psychological theory, is gendered.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Content

This article lacks content in general. It is talking about female psychology, but mostly from a male psychological perspective. Most of their discussions are based on male psychology and it doesn't provide many examples as to why female psychology is different.

Tone

It also seems to be a more biased article, rather than being completely neutral. The male perspective appears to be overrepresented.

Sources

The link on the first source does not work. Everything seems to be poorly cited and there's still not a lot of information.

Talk page

The talk page has some really interesting discussions going on. Apparently it has undergone a lot of editing already; however it still needs a lot of work. A lot of the information has been deleted since it was just a discussion of men's attacks against women, nothing to do with female psychology.