User:Danimorales24/2020 Women's March/Vhvanessa Peer Review

I enjoyed reading the information you contributed to your article. The paragraphs you added to your article were very informative. Your paragraphs are also well structured and stayed on topic. The content that you added was not bias and remained neutral. The content that you have written is also concise and clear. Your contribution to the article did a great job at addressing an underrepresented topic, by doing so, you are being a part of closing Wikipedia's equity gap. Your content was also well organized into sections. It would be better to have resources that peer reviewed articles but for your topic I assume it would would be difficult to find peer reviewed articles. The current resources you are using good as they do reflect what you are writing about. The links to your articles do work so you did a good job at properly citing and linking your articles. Overall, you did a great job. Your content is a great contribution to the article by being clear, concise and neutral. You also used a variety of sources and properly linked and cited them.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)