User:Dank/FLC

Dank

 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * [Additional disclaimer: I can't read Tagalog.]
 * Checking the FLC criteria:
 * 1. [I did some minor copyediting; feel free to revert.] You've got two prose reviews so far; I'll skip that part. [ Nothing is jumping out at me as a prose problem.] I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, and it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find).
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Close enough for a support. Well done.