User:Danni Laura/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluatin
Genghis Khan

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article is relevant and informative for the class. Genghis Khan established the largest country in the world, which is of great historical significance and research value. My initial impression of it is that it is rigorous and comprehensive. It refers to many sources and provides a comprehensive introduction to the growth history of Genghis Khan.

Evaluate the article
This article mainly tells the life story, achievements, and influence of Genghis Khan. In the lead section, a clear and concise overview of Genghis Khan is provided. It begins by identifying Genghis Khan as a pioneering leader who established the largest empire in history. The lead also covers most of the main content of the article, including Genghis Khan's name and title, early life, how he came to power, and how to defeat his opponents. As well as the reforms and consolidation of power in his early rule, and the expansion and return to the west in the later period of his rule. Also his family, death and influence, character, and achievements. Finally, there are heritage and historical assessments, but no sources are included.

The content of the article also covers all important aspects of Genghis Khan without overemphasizing any part. The content stays on topic and provides an objective account of key aspects of Genghis Khan's life, achievements, military campaigns, and legacy.

The author has always remained neutral in the article, but now people have mixed reviews about him. In Russia and the Muslim world, Genghis Khan is considered a backward and barbaric tyrant, while Mongolia posthumously canonized him as a god. The author always maintains an objective attitude and introduces Genghis Khan's deeds and descendants' evaluations in detail.

The article has comprehensive and authoritative sources, the writing is clear and professional, there are no grammatical errors, and the pictures are included to help people strengthen their understanding of the topic. The Talk page talks about how modern scholarship thinks Muslims would view Genghis Khan in the heritage section. This level-3 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. The overall impression the article gives is that it is comprehensive and objective, with rich and reliable sources. I think this article is very complete. However, the lead section does not contain the following information about the source of information, which can be improved.