User:Dannnielaa

Article evaluation: Human services

Content


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything looks fine and is well connected to the topic.


 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * This article has lots of history and lacks a bit of information about the present.
 * What else could be improved?
 * Some sentences that don't really make sense to me personally and adding more information about today's time frame.

Tone


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article seems pretty neutral its just more history telling.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No, Its just that it talks a lot about how it started and how to build and become a social worker. It also over represented the online course that can be taken and not including the college route.

Sources


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The citations work much leads to books or pdf. Yes, great supportive sources.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * This seems to come more from books and do seem reliable references.

Talk page


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * The conversation seems to be only two people and seem to be just discussing areas that have been improved.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * The article is rated at a rating- class and yes its apart of the WikiProject social work.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Week 4


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Are some areas under- or over-developed?
 * It seems Under developed and more just talks about the schooling systems of private schools around they world.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes, It has lots of information from man places from around the world.
 * Does each claim have a citation? Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes, they seem realistic.
 * What can you add?
 * Yes, as a group we would like to add about the differences about public schools and Private schools.
 * Also, the way that things are tough if there is any difference.
 * Some paragraphs also need some more work and information to be added.

My contribution to my article: