User:Danre98/AfD log

This is a log of all deletion discussion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's XfD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

August 2021

 * Taliban first press conference: nominated at AfD; notified 19:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: The article is not notable per WP:NOTNEWS. It is a news report, which violates criterion #2 of not news. The subject also fails the 10 year test and probably won't be relevant in the future.

July 2022

 * Durable: nominated at AfD; notified 17:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Contested PROD. From my PROD statement: I doubt the topic is notable and I was unable to find any sources that could contribute to it meeting the WP:GNG or WP:NCORP, including the sources on the German Wikipedia. The contesting editor (User:Baptx) added some better non-company-affiliated sources to the article, but I found that is not significant coverage, only giving two sentences' mention. The other one,, is paywalled but even if its content is independent (see WP:ORGIND), I doubt it has significant coverage especially if it is like this non-paywalled article on the same event. Notability is not inherited, and an article that primarily discusses an executive staffing change likely does not give enough WP:CORPDEPTH to its coverage about the company itself.Due to the page name that the article is at, I think that the page should become a redirect to Durability (adjective-to-noun redirect) again.

August 2022

 * Madeinox–BRIC–AR Canelas: nominated at AfD; notified 06:59, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Non-notable cycling team: fails to meet the WP:GNG or even get close. The only source is database-esque, indiscriminate, and only gives the roster (not significant). WP:BEFORE yielded nothing beyond the roster except for the fact that they were in the 3rd tier of UCI road racing for a few seasons. The relevant SNG at WP:NCYCLING says Significant coverage is likely to exist for a team if it [is] a men's road team in the 1st (UCI WorldTeam), 2nd (UCI ProContinental), or 3rd (UCI Continental) tier. However, I don't think that significant coverage is likely to exist for this article specifically because it only competed in the first two seasons, it is far from meeting the GNG, and the team did not place well (going off of 2005–06 UCI Europe Tour, complete standings might be lost to time).The article has also been problematic and tagged with a reference needed template for 16 years. It cannot be fixed.

October 2022

 * Four Presidents Corners: nominated at AfD; notified 18:19, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: This article is a non-notable near recreation of Four Presidents Corners, Indiana, which was deleted after this AfD. This incarnation is about the point itself, whereas the previous article was about a purported village about the point. There aren't any secondary sources that give significant coverage I could find, and--on WP:TWL--there were just a few mentions of the Four Pres. Corners Historical Society. I also analyzed some of the sources at Talk:Four Presidents Corners. It's just not important enough to have received anything resempling in-depth coverage (and is far from meeting the applicable SNG WP:GEOFEAT).