User:Danstronger/sandbox

Counterpoint
I suspect there is more of a variety of opinions on the beauty of Euler's identity than is reflected in the article. I propose adding the following paragraph to the end of the mathematical beauty section:

By contrast, proponents of using $$2\pi$$ instead of $$\pi$$ as the fundamental circle constant, with $$2\pi$$ denoted as tau ($$\tau$$), have argued that Euler's identity is less beautiful than the corresponding identity using tau: $$e^{i\tau} = 1$$. They state that this equation is simpler than $$e^{i\pi} + 1 = 0$$, which is a rearrangement of $$e^{i\pi} = -1$$.

Danstronger (talk) 01:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)