User:Darius Crew/User:Darius Crew/sandbox/Kiara2005 Peer Review

General info
Darius
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?  (Darius Crew)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Darius Crew/sandbox - Wikipedi
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lead
 * The leading paragraph doesn’t describe what the rest of the article is about.
 * No, the lead doesn’t give an overall description of the major sections.
 * Yes, the lead has certain pieces of information that wasn’t already said in the article.
 * The lead isn’t too detailed, it just points out a few facts.
 * Content
 * Yes, the information that is in the article is relevant to the topic.
 * Yes, the sources that were cited are up to date and recent, they are all within the 2000’s.
 * This topic doesn’t have any equity gaps, it simply just talks about basketball and simple facts about the NBA.
 * Tone & Balance
 * Yes, the content is neutral.
 * No, all the information in this article is unbiased simply because it’s general information about the NBA.
 * Sources & References
 * All the sentences were backed up with sources.
 * Yes, when you look back at the sources the sentences and information in the article reflect back to the cited sources.
 * The sources are current and are written by a diverse spectrum of people.
 * Organization
 * The information is well-written and organized.
 * I didn’t see any spelling errors. His topics are organized, and the information correlates with each other.
 * Overall It was a nice piece to read but, in the beginning, it was a little hard to understand or to know what was being talked about. However, the rest of the article was easy to read and had great information.