User:Darlene.d79/sandbox

Human Migration Notes

 * the description of what isn't migration is distracting
 * nothing stood out as bias to me, and all the theories on migration received about the same coverage
 * the citation links work- but I am not sure the first one supports the claim being made. It shows from which countries people migrate to the U.S. the most, but not that these numbers all moved over together/at once to support the 'large groups' theory
 * there are some missing citations, but they are noted by past editors
 * the author has a trend of using reliable sources. For example, they frequently made use of the UNPFA International Migration report of 2013.
 * the information under the "migration statistics" is out of date because it cites a study done 5 years ago (the one mentioned in the line above)
 * the general conversation happening in the talk page is that this article has a lot of work that needs to be done on it; perhaps even whipped clean and begun anew. Some critiques said the article's main problem is that it lacks any modern discussion, while another said the article "mixes" things up in a way that oversimplifies certain topics of or relating to migration.
 * this article has a C-class rating and is a part of 7 Wiki projects (of top-importance for 3)
 * We did not discuss immigration "corridors" or the who the top remittance recipient countries were in class. When addressing the different theories on why people migrate the article's description of neoclassical economics is worded in a misleading manner compared to how we discussed it in class-like it's trying to disguise how simpleminded it is. We did not discuss the osmosis theory in class. The article does not distinguish between stock and flow immigration data.