User:Das856

The demise of Pluto raise certain fundamental questions.One of the question is..should we have a defined process for defining things?Let me elaborate,was it defined at the time when the definition of Planets was decided that at what interval and on what parameters we can change the definition...If not,is not it a violation of agreed parameters.The nine planets and their names have become ingrained into the minds of humans and the recent "correction" may take years to change that..and by the time the change becomes constant..we may have another change.

Philosophically,it is saying "Size does matter" as do "proximity"...Bechara Pluto was a puny one in size and farthest by Heliocentric as well Geocentric approach...Lesson is "Be near to the powerful" or "Become big in your own right"...Survival of the fittest...either by genotype or phenotype.