User:Daspj/Artificial intelligence in healthcare/NeuroResident Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Daspj


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Daspj/Artificial intelligence in healthcare


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Artificial intelligence in healthcare

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article contains a number of wonderful additions to several of the current research subsections within the artificial intelligence in healthcare article, making the article more complete and of significantly increased utility for readers. Well done!

Lead:

The lead has not yet been updated to reflect the added content, which would aid readers in finding this key information. The introductory sentence of the lead is clear in describing the scope of the article.

Sources:

A number of sources have been placed into the cardiovascular, dermatology, radiology, and disease diagnosis sections. Additional sources have been cited for gastroenterology, infectious disease, medical education, oncology, opthalmology, urology, and creation of new drugs with brief descriptions within the sandbox. These sources are entirely secondary in nature and are a combination of reviews and systematic reviews which are appropriate.

Content:

A section on cardiology has been drafted and migrated to the live page. This section contains details relevant to the topic and is up-to-date. Overall, the information is clear and concise, well-written, and follows an easy to read format. The planned revisions are a large undertaking and will be a fantastic accomplishment.

Tone:

The tone of the created sections is neutral and unbiased. The planned additions are sensible and the workplan is feasible and comprehensive.

Images:

The article is currently sparse in terms of images. Addition of an image or two within the article could help break up the text and provide visual guidance on the topic.

Overall:

The added content has nicely improved the scope and detail of the article. I was particularly impressed with the broad collection of sources across many disciplines within artificial intelligence. The article is certainly more complete, and with the planned remaining changes will be significantly improved from its original state. The content can be further improved by updating the lead to point readers to the new additions.