User:Dataclassaccount/Zan Armstrong/Nuc13arPanda Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dataclassaccount


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dataclassaccount/Zan_Armstrong?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is informative and unbiased. A little lacking though More info would be nice.

The content is also good! It is precise and very informative. Still a little short but it is hard to find more about her. I looked into the data visualization as well and it is very interesting! Maybe include an image of it in the article.

The sources are good and the links work!

The info seems to be backed up well and by credible sources.

The article stayed very unbiased and is well organized. It also doesn't have any spelling mistakes that I could see.

The article is notable. The article also seems mostly exhaustive. The structure is similar to other articles as well. The article is currently not discoverable from other articles but that can be changed.