User:Dauletaruzhan01/Kereyit

Kereyit — (Mongolian. caraid-Christians) included in the rebellion of the Small Zhuz.

Kereyit-a kind as a part of the Kazakh people. According to the pedigree, it is part of the Semirechensk Association as part of the Junior Zhuz. From Kerala spread elder, rod Bozener. History kerenskogo tribes known in ancient written monuments from the 7th century On the territory of the rivers Onon, the Kerulen Argun revised continuity Kerey Kerenskogo khanate, a territory of the rivers Onon, the Kerulen Argun. In the works of Rashid al-DIN, Kadyrgali Bek, Abul Khair Khan, writing on paper the events of those times, the name of the Khan of the khanate, which he was called Ceranj. Genghis Khan, with the Irtysh, the Ob and further along the occupied regional administration, over time, Character after the Middle Zhuz in the structure, the names on the indigenous end of the “t” was a detailed application. And Keratty included in the Uzbeks, Kyrgyz, kept the first ancient names, such as private rulesy the Younger Zhuz. At the same time, Kerey Khan in the Junior Zhuz together with the campaign of Genghis Khan achieved Central Asia, participated in the direction of these countries to the Empire of Genghis Khan, becoming in this region. Then their part became a part of the Uzbek, the second-the Kirghiz, the third-the Younger Zhuz. Motto-the elder, character: y, / – - silber.

Origin
Historical ataur is located in Western Mongolia. 4-13 centuries — in Christian religion.

The first data on kereyit belong to the beginning of the XII century. On the river Onon, the Kerulen and by the lake Buyur, i.e. on the territory of Mongolia, says Rashid al-DIN, the tribe kereit. However should considered, that this tribe existed significantly before this time, so as to XII century it was a strong force against Genghis Khan. Information about kereyit in the XIII century, we will tell G. Find in the records of Rubruk, Carpini, and then Marco Polo. There is no need to consider the political history of this tribe, it is not our task. At the beginning of the XIII century after the death of kereyit Vanhi moved to power Genghis Khan and became part of his Empire. Carettera the question of arrival on the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan, such as opacity, and then the tribe that is not clear in history. In our opinion, after the kereyits destroyed Genghis Khan and included them in the Mongolian state, they participated in the Mongol conquests to the West, and settled there. According to Mohammed Haidar, since the XIV century, any part of the kereits was part of the Mughals of mogolistan. In the XV century kereits were part of the Union of Uzbek tribes, and then part of the Kazakh people. According to Valikhanov, after the formation of the Kazakh people, the kereits were part of the Great Zhuz, and soon their main part was allocated by the odes and Uzbek relatives left. The rest of the kerayit the Kazakhs attached to the family getro. About kereits, as a genus, which is now included in the Junior Zhuz, And in the middle of XVIII century. From Tevkelev, and then A. Find Levshin. This ore is constantly found in the writings of later studies.

The ethnic origin of the kereits is very important. Researchers have no opinions about this. Rashid AddIn in his work indicates that in the XIII century the kereits were not Turkic, but revised Mongols. It is this author who does not say that in the question of the origin of the kereits in another place. He writes that between peoples "did not exist before the Mongolian name" was the khereids. And further "the kerayit were called by the Mongols, to praise oneself," and before "this name is not recognized". This opinion should be understood as follows: during the reign of the Mongols, their subjects, including the kereyites, did not have the Mongols themselves, but adopted the ethnic name of the conquerors. Valikhanov, Bartold Kerey treated completely obvious to the Mongols. Grimgrimoire also doubts that Kerei come from the Turks. Astana M. P. Potanin, N. A. Aristov, Honors and others were quite the opposite view. For example, G. M. P. Potanin believes that he began to be called Mongols to "get his rank" only at the time when Genghis Khan-ol. Although not related to each other, X. C. Honors Ian A. Aristov at the same time came to the conclusion that the khereids were released from the Turks. X. Honors based its vision on the show of Turkish names and titles koreiskih khans. On the origin of the kerayit S. Amanzholov has also adopted such a clear view, he said: "trailer (caracter Century). V.) in any case not had the Mongols not been called by the Mongols". And further: "the part of the Mongols, forced to move to the West during the invasion (of cerealera Century). C.) kereyit called, and all the others on the former earth did not accept joining their names "it". It seems to us that two approaches to the truth of this problem need to be considered. First, whether it is correct to consider kereits and kereys as one shoulder: because some researchers tend to consider them as one shoulder, and others not so. Secondly, the question of belonging to the kereits to the Mongols or Turks is closely related to the first and to some extent depends on it.

Orientalist F. A. Aristov, V. V. Bartold, M. S. Tynyshbaev and S. A. Abdrakhmanov admitted that it two tribe. M. P. A. Aristov does not give such explanation, simply says Kareah and kereits as one tribe. V. V. Bartold also works in the desert. M. If Tynyshbaev, more cautious, writes that the Kerey can be part of the Kerey, allocated during the escape from Genghis Khan and gone to the West. M. S. As Tynyshbaev A. Amanzholov, as we have seen above, believes kerayit part of Kerey.

Talking of the kereyits, X. Hovers not associate them with the Kerey. Grimgrimoire trailer of coiling and kereiti cal (here), referring to such props as "Czeslaw yuan sansouires" ("dictionary of the amendments to the indigenous people's names found in the history of the dynasty Csiii, Liao and yuan"), considers their various tribes. M. S. Tynyshbaev and S. A. According to Amanzholova, trailer, gone to the West, became known as Karaite, in our opinion, not entirely accurate. We know that the source of the khereids lived in the East, in particular in Mongolia. As we showed earlier, Rashid AddIn, rubrics, Marco Polo and P. Carpini say this. In the dictionary implemented two-way transfer."(§ 96, 104, 105, 126 and others). Some other evidence shows this clearly. For example, in" Huangshi " says anchan is from the tribe of Hassan Kalei (Kere). About the khereids Kalei also mentioned in" the Blue Wanishi". At the same time, as in other countries, they may not be as Mogolia, perhaps, lived in the XII century, and even earlier.

On the presence of keraites and their habitat. D. Martin reported that says that the khereids moved Tole on the rivers Orkhon, the Ongon and granicami with the naimans in the East. We're N. D. We see that Martin named the places that Rashid AddIn spoke about, the habitat of the kereits. This opinion is confirmed by the "Yuanshi", which says:" vanhan lived in the valley (once) in these places." Here mentioned Sanjo Kamchatskaya area located in the South-East of the Yenisei, in the South-East of Kyrgyzstan in the North, Tannery.

Thus, in all known us props States about Kerey, not about Kerey. This implies that many researchers say that trailer and keraita can't be one that kerati out part of cerealera "went West".

We in the XXIII centuries were not Kerey, were Kereyit, they before Genghis Khan destroyed himself, were ancient feudal strong States, and "their leaders were powerful kings." After the defeat of the kereits by Genghis Khan, some of them separated along the Irtysh river, where possible. One parish Kiraitu went to the Western side of the Irtysh river, and then continue. Many of them became part of the neighboring Altai peoples. Some even compositions of other Nations retain their primary ethical title. While Kerey left on Irtysh, and then in the steppe of Northern Kazakhstan, lost connection "it" in the name and began to be called "Kerey", and then was a part of the Kazakh people as independent Kerey secret.

We see Kereyits among Kyrgyz daolasa. At the end of the XIX century, the question of the origin of the genus kereyit, which entered the Junior Zhuz in the early XX century, to us in the shortest possible time looks like this.