User:David Torres Montalvo/Independent music/PMG2020UPRC Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Reviewing David Torres work.
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:David Torres Montalvo/Independent music

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.
 * The Lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections.
 * The Lead does not include information that is not present in the article.
 * The Lead is concise but needs more information.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * The page was last edited on October 22 2020.
 * There is content that is missing.
 * It does not address topics related to historically underrepresented topics?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The content added is neutral.
 * there are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * There are viewpoints underrepresented like history.
 * The content does not attempt to persuade the reader.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Most sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic.
 * some links work, some are not found.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * There is not much content aded.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * The article does not include images.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?