User:Davidbbell3/Silver mining/BenjCap Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Davidbbell3


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Davidbbell3/Silver mining


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Silver mining

Evaluate the drafted changes
These edits are very well written and provide excellent unbiased coverage of the topic of silver mining. Although, I believe a few issues do occur. There are a few clarity mistakes that can be seen in the introduction in the second last paragraph “silver mining is extraction of the ore, as silver” should be changed to “silver mining is the extraction of the ore, as silver”. Another similar error can be seen in the last paragraph of the introduction with “silver can harvested from scrap materials” should be edited to “silver can be harvested from scrap materials”. The second issue is with the structure and format of the introduction. The edited introduction is very long and drawn out combining various topics that deserve their own section. In the future possibly breaking up the last three paragraphs and foreshadow what is to come later in the article. When looking at the sources used in the article some should be updated both the tables in the article information are almost 10 years old. Updating this information could provide a better understanding of the current production levels of silver. Other areas in the article also appear to have uncited facts. Another issue with the citations is that there is no hyperlink to the websites, DOI for the journals, or IBSN for the books. Finally, this article does an excellent job maintaining a neutral stance by having a balance in viewpoints and no overrepresentation. Furthermore, the structure of this article is very well organized, and I believe it will fit into the article well.