User:Davidxosh/LivGolfTeams/Rsintchak Peer Review

General info
Davidxosh
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Davidxosh/LivGolfTeams
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):User:Davidxosh/LivGolfTeams

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Lead is simple and allows me to understand topic very quickly
 * Needs sourcing
 * Could be a sentence longer to further introduce topic
 * Lead matches with following section
 * Could emphasize this article is relevent to teams only

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Avoid terms like "last season" and reference to months, as seen in the Teams section; instead, include the date/year.


 * Lots of the clubs descriptions use liv golf as citation; try to diversify if possible for balance.
 * The content is good and very objective/expository. Left the article with a good understanding of LivGolf and how it works, what it is, and the players/teams involved
 * How it works section is strong and explains recent development and finalists of sport

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The content is very neutral and does not persuade me in any direction.
 * Does a good job showing the players who lead the sport without calling them great, just points out their success objectively with scores and results

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * No bibliography
 * Can not access your sources, need to hyperlink claims to bibliography
 * Use of *liv golf citation a lot
 * Can not evaulate if reliable sources/plagarism/proper paraphrasing

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Content is well organized, easy to follow, and does not appear to have spelling and grammar errors
 * Concise content that leaves the reader feeling informed
 * Good organization, could include more sections other than clubs to inform reader more, maybe a history section?

Images and Media

 * Article links to various relevant images that are by Wikipedia
 * The images help structure and flow of reading

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * No, no list of sources provided
 * ESPN cited, not secondary source?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * NA, no sources provided
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Structure, headings, and organization of article is good and seems to follow similair articles
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
 * Not right now
 * Could link LivGolf Wikipedia page, players names, and teams

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * After reading this, I felt very informed about Livgolf and the associated teams. You did a good job explaining the teams and players associated, as well as their scores and rankings without being biased. The structure is very strong, and there is an effective lead that introduces topic before elaborating on how teams work and the teams themselves.
 * Main thing would be hyperlinking to other articles as well as developing the bibliography
 * Could not tell you if sources were reliable without links provided