User:Dawid2009/first messages

Oppose I am sure that it is not accident that William Heffelginger has been rated as high-important topic by relevant wikiproject. Colin Kaepernick has recently more pageviews than Kylian Mbappé (|Colin_Kaepernick) but he has been rated as low-importance topic by relevant wikiprojects. Maybe we do not need 40 american football players or 1200 quota for sport figures but William do not deserve to go first. Now I see that it is not the same case what Lucien Laurent.


 * I agree that a lot of personalities related with modern popculture (such like Billy Mitchell, Dan Bilzerian, Justin Bieber and Kylie Jenner) deserve for featured article but I doubt that the list will be reasonable if we include detailed personalities related with futurable culture such like Narcissa Wright, El Rubius or Vitaly Zdorovetskiy. I do not doubt that these people are top of futurable representative field but who we are to say that they will be vital in future? In my opinion these three people could be listed in other page such like Wikiproject Biographies/vital people in various modern cultures against other people with current red links such like Brittany Renner who also have their top of futurable representative field and popularity at higher level.
 * I belive that If we are going to have 15 000 biographies we can left small space for some specific biographies/representatives, but if topic which is not describe in Britannica have more pageviews than other topic which is not described in Britannica, it not necessary mean that more popular topic is more vital than that fewer popular topic. For example One-T is famous edm music bad ( as GuzzyG said that edm music is vital). And this popular music band really has fame just thank to jazz/rock band Blue Effect. One-T has been famous band thank to their several songs and people do not realise that just these songs really had been simply sampled from other songs composed by Blue Effect (e g see: The Magic Key (song)). These band are not vital at this level but it is example why something what is tredy not necessary must be more vital and interesing for our readers or future generation (both could be featured but it is at least the same vitality, one-T in that case does not need to be more vital)