User:Daytontalbot/Wolfe cycle/Adam micro Peer Review

General info
Daytontalbot
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Daytontalbot/Wolfe cycle:

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Overall the article looked wonderful, super neutral and fact oriented, not trying to drive home any point. You had plenty of references that were cited correctly and were what I considered reliable sources. Furthermore, just like myself, you just need to add more content to your article. But truly a great start.