User:Daytontalbot/Wolfe cycle/AndrewT21 Peer Review

General info
Daytontalbot
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Daytontalbot/Wolfe cycle
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the draft
Content seems to be scientifically correct. References seem to be good resources that help explain article. A picture or graph of the wolf cycle might be good to have if available. I would also edit it by adding more information explaining certain topics that are used in the beginning paragraph.