User:Dbhaskar13/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Androgen

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because the article I edited is hyperandrogenism. I chose the article, because it directly relates to the article I edited, and almost functions like a "precursor" reading type article for hyperandrogenism. Androgens are very important hormones, and I thought the article did a great job defining them, and explaining their multiple functions.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article contains a strong lead section. It defines androgens and their importance in a concise way. I also liked the content. I thought that the sections were organized well, and the images were helpful for the reader to better understand the topic. I do think it could be helpful to try to replace some of the older references (for instance, one of the references was from 1974). However, I also recognize that some fundamental concepts about androgens haven't changed drastically over time, and these references may be necessary or classically referenced ones within the field. I checked a few links and they worked. I didn't notice any major gaps within the article, or sections I felt that needed to be added. Overall, I thought that the article was well-written.