User:Dburke11/Epigenetic therapy/BayleyPlumb Peer Review

General info
Dburke11
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Dburke11/Epigenetic therapy
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Epigenetic therapy

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The sandbox draft does not have a clear lead section but does have information that could be formatted as a lead section. The original article has a short lead section but this could be enhanced and improved after rewriting in order to give a brief overview of the entire article. The information in the sandbox so far is relevant to the topic. Mostly I only see sections of the original article copied and pasted into sandbox with maybe a few grammar edits. A plan of action could be to edit smaller sections of the original article at a time and/or treat the article like a new article due to all the issues posted. There are a few links to sources but they are not cited correctly nor are they included after the sentences they support. The article could be improved by making clear sections with factual information. It is important to rid the article of bias and opinions.