User:Dc10732/Misinformation/Gmp76 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dc10732


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dc10732/Misinformation?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Misinformation

Evaluate the drafted changes
Regarding the body of the article, the content that was added is all relevant to the topic and is up-to-date. Regarding the tone and balance, all content that was added seems to be neutral. There does not seem to be any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. It also does not seem that any viewpoints are overrepresented, or underrepresented. Furthermore, the content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Regarding the sources and references, I think that some of the new content added under the "online misinformation section" should be backed up by a reliable secondary source of information. Other then that everything looks good and the content added does accurately reflect what the sources say. The sources are thorough, current, and seem to be written by a diverse spectrum of authors. Additionally, I think you did a good job with pulling sources that are peer-reviewed but also using other websites when needed. It seemed that all the links to references worked as well.

Regarding the organization, the content that you added seems to be concise, clear, and easy to read. One thing to correct is make sure to place all periods before the citation number instead of after. Overall, the content is well written, well organized and broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic.