User:Dc211/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Cold and heat adaptations in humans

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I thought the article had a lot of substance and I thought it sounded interesting to read about. I think this matters because it helps us understand ourselves and how our bodies adapt to heat and cold better. My preliminary impression was that the article was very organized and had a lot of helpful links towards other topics one would need to further understand the original topic.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The introductory sentence was concise and informative, the detail felt like the right amount and it lead to further reading well. The content seemed up to date in my opinion and didn't feel outdated or uninformed. I did not notice anything missing from the article, I felt like the information was all present that one would need to understand the topic, especially with the links embedded within. The tone was scholarly and not opinionated. I did not read anything that sounded biased. Every source seemed to be from a scholarly source like an article or book. There were also credits within the article linking back to specific sources. The article was clear and provided helpful definitions of things that people might not commonly know. On the talk page there is a question of someone asking for more clarity on one section of the article and how the article could be improved by adding a few more sections. Overall the article felt strong to me and I felt like it was concise and clear with the information provided. I think it could be improved with the addition of the sections mentioned in the talk page.