User:Dcharway/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Data Privacy Day)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(I chose to evaluate to evaluate the data privacy article because it is an subject of interest for most organization lately. It matters because data privacy is the main basis of cybersecurity. My primary impression of this article is how the scope grew wider over time as a result of the complexities of the modern threat landscape)

Evaluate the article
(The article describes data privacy day which is held annually which was primarily observed in Europe and has spread throughout the world. It started from raising awareness among social media and the scope later became expanded to cover a wide area to include families, consumers and businesses.

Lead section:

Yes, because it covers the vents goals, purpose, the evolution, focus, goals and captures the right audience in its drive in promoting data privacy. Its also throws more light on the origin and transformation overtime. It also details all its participants. It basically promotes the data privacy and emboldens the cause of data protection.

Content:

The article’s content is relevant as it describes the processes and stages for data privacy and reasons for the efforts placed into data protection and support for encouraging data privacy.

Tone and Balance:

I believe the article was presented in a neutral point of view as it focus on the core relevant areas on the vents background and positively critiques the discussions of data privacy from multiple angles. The only noticeable lapse was that the article does not deeply portray the raw specific views. The article also prioritized the recognition of its international participants than discussing the in-depth analysis of data privacy to some degree.

Organization and writing quality:

There were no specific leads to determine if the article was written by a diverse group. It lacks the identity for diverse group authoring. It can also be determined that the relevance of the article is placed on the event and history rather than individual contributors and views from diverse groups. The sources listed seems to be pretty genuine in its entirety.

Images and Media:

The data privacy data article did not portray images and linked media. The links to references were cited to other sources from which the article was developed or relied.

The article basically lacks support and clarity for specific details about discussing among various authors and contributors. The article is presented for global observance of data privacy and data protection education rather than presenting the underlining support for factual information among the various contributor’s discussions among opposing views of the authors..)