User:Dcloset788/Dictyota sandvicensis/Lisac12 Peer Review

General info
Lisa Chapman
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Dcloset788/Dictyota sandvicensis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Dictyosphaeria versluysii

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.) The article provides a concise introduction to Dictyota sandvicensis, highlighting its unique characteristics, habitat, and nutritional value. It's structured in a way that offers a clear overview of the species, its distribution in Hawaii, and its significance both ecologically and as a food source./Thank you for the evaluation. You gave me compliments. However, I need fix about nutritional value sentences.
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? The inclusion of specific details about its habitat at ‘Ewa Beach and the quantification of its abundance and nutritional content are particularly impressive. These details provide depth to the article, illustrating the species' role in its ecosystem and its value to the diet./ Thank you for further compliments on my species.  The habitat at ‘Ewa Beach where the species could grow abundance nutrients, but it needs more understandable explanation.
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) Yes, the article stays focused on Dictyota sandvicensis, providing detailed information specific to this species without diverging into unrelated topics. /Thank you for the review.
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? Since you haven't listed specific subtitles, it's hard to judge their appropriateness. However, based on the content provided, potential subtitles could be "Description," "Habitat," "Distribution," and "Nutritional Value," which would each be appropriate for organizing the information presented./ I truly appreciate that you gave me specific subtitles for my sentences. As you mentioned "Nutritional Value", If it has the subtitle, it would be great. I did not come up with this idea.
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? The information seems well-organized according to the descriptions you've given. Ensuring that each section strictly adheres to its title will help maintain clarity and focus. / I will fix them. Thank you for the specific explanation. Your suggestions help my sentences of the development.
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) The writing is straightforward and informative, suitable for a diverse audience. Keeping the language simple yet descriptive is key for engaging a wide range of readers./Thank you for the evaluation. As you said, my sentences need to further develop in order to engage diverse readers.
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? You've mentioned references alongside the facts, which is good practice. Ensuring every significant claim is backed by a reference strengthens the article's credibility./ Thank you for checking references as well.
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? Yes, you've provided a reference list, which is essential for academic and factual accuracy. Ensuring each reference is correctly formatted and accessible would be beneficial./ I am relieved to hear my reference is correct format. Thank you for checking whether the references are accessible.
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? It appears so, based on your description./ Thank you for checking each source.
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? The sources listed are reputable and relevant, including scientific publications and research studies, which are appropriate for an article of this nature./ I appreciate that you checked each source if they are relevant on the species.
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? Adding more visual elements, like photographs or diagrams of Dictyota sandvicensis, could enhance the article by providing visual context.Thank you for your suggestion. I have to review with Wikipedia study for adding photos.
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? With some minor improvements, such as the addition of visuals and possible expansion on certain topics like ecological impact, the article could be ready for a wider audience. Ensuring all sources are correctly cited and formatting issues are resolved is also necessary before publication. I will review and develop my species along with your all suggestion. Also, I will find a source for the expansion on the ecological impact.
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Incorporating visuals and ensuring the article is thoroughly sourced and cited are the most critical steps. /I will go over source cited again and review on how to post the visual photo on my species.
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? The approach of providing detailed, specific information about a species, including its habitat, nutritional value, and ecological role, is something that can be applied to articles on other species. This detailed approach helps build a comprehensive understanding of the subject./ Again, thank you for your complements for my species. I am happy to hear that my specie's habitat, nutritional value, and ecological role could be utilized other species. Though, my specie's nutritional value, and ecological role should be explained understandable and keeping the language to be simple.