User:Dcloset788/Dictyota sandvicensis/Makana V Peer Review

General info
(provide username) MakanaV
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Dcloset788/Dictyota sandvicensis - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? The structure of everything is pretty sound i think maybe some headers such as location, appearances, etc would be helpful./Thank you for the suggestion. Yes, as you said, there is a need replacement of the location and appearances.
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) yes
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? yes
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? the information provided is all key to understanding the topic
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) everything is simple and works well, there is no unimportant stuff / Thank you for the evaluations.
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? yes
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? yes
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? yes
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? good quality resources, uses the books provided in class along with other credible sources./ Thank you for checking my references.
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? some headers to help w structuring would be great. / As you mentioned earlier, your suggestion helps me. I will fix them.
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? not quite yet but close to it / Thank you for reviewing on my species.
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? If there is any more information about the possible life cycle or history of the organism that could be added. / I appreciate your suggestions. As you said, if it is added life cycle or history of organism, that would be improved.
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? yes the sources are really good and I think i can find other sources to pull information from/ I appreciate your all evaluation on my species. You pointed out some details which should be fix them. I will review along with your suggestions. Also, I am happy to hear that my sources are good and you will find other sources for your species.