User:Dcorso1/Pinstripes/Panopit Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dcorso1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Pinstripes


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pinstripes

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is pretty brief but it is there. At the moment it is a one sentence definition of what pinstripes is but it is definitely crucial to the page because people need to know what they are reading about so he is doing a good job there. He does a good job because it is not overly detailed so that helps his page. The content is definitely relevant to the topic because he provides examples of who uses pinstripes and that is what the page is all about. It is up to date because he mentions teams that use pinstripes and they still all do so he is doing good with that. This is good because it does deal with Wikipedia's equity gaps because you will not find an article just about pinstripes. This does a great job of being neutral because it just provides the reader with information but there is no sense of any bias in the article. The writer uses credible sources and they are all neutral and just there to provide information. It is well written, and the only thing I would recommend is to just keep adding more. So far it is really good and on the right path but it needs some more information which I believe the writer intends to do.