User:Dcronin26/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Remote Sensing Wikipedia

-Everything on the page is relevant to the topic of remote sensing. I could not identify anything within the article that is distracting.

-The entire article remains neutral on remote sensing.

-Most of the main aspects in the article represent viewpoints equitably. One section that could be underrepresented is the Remote Sensing Software section.

-The citations in the article work and contain supporting evidence for claims. The only link that did not work was: Overwatch Textron Systems (page did not exist).

-Most of the facts within the remote sensing article are backed by neutral, reliable evidence. The information comes from journals and product websites for technical specifications.

-The talk pages consists of wikipedians asking to justify the contributions others added.

-The article is rated a level 4-vital article.

Google Earth Engine

To improve this section of the page, there should be more case studies that show the uses of Google Earth Engine identified. Already in the article there is a small amount of information about finding water and deforestation. Additional information should include epidemic mapping, species habitat monitoring, and global surface water. If any other notable uses are discovered they will be included. 

-Tiger Habitat Monitoring

-Malaria Risk Mapping

-Global Surface Water