User:Ddmiller12/Schema (psychology)/AddieGrace Peer Review

General info
Dmiller12
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Ddmiller12/Schema (psychology)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Schema (psychology)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The schematic processing section needs more sources. There are several statements in that section with no citation or a repeated citation. Repeated citations are not bad but a different source would further solidify the statements validity. Is Barlett the only researcher that deserves a subheading? If there are other researchers present in this section then they should each be split up with a new subheading. Also there could be other researchers not mentioned in this article. The self-schema section could also use more sources.