User:DeLandNebbb/Terron Beckham/Patriciatrinidad19 Peer Review

Whose work are you reviewing?
User:DeLandNebbb

Link to draft you're reviewing
User:DeLandNebbb/Terron Beckham

Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
N/a

Lead

 * Has the lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - I think your lead section does reflect the content discussed in the body of your article. For example, in your "Content Creation" section, you talk about how Terron Beckham is both a streamer and gamer, which is noted in the lead, as well.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? - The lead does include an introductory sentence that describes what this article is about. The first sentence of your article let us know who Terron Beckham is and what he does for a living. Overall, your first sentence does a good job of setting the stage for everything that comes next.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? - Yes, the lead provides a brief description of the different sections you will discuss in your article. You summarize all your key points in a short and effective way.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? - You did a good job of creating a lead section that touches on the most important points in your article body. I would say that the information present in your lead reflects what is in your article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? - I think the lead is concise because it goes straight to the point and is worded in a way that makes it readable for anyone. Also, your article is well-organized in that each major section is mentioned in the lead.

Content

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - I think the content added is relevant to the topic. Since you are writing an article on a person, I think you have done a good job of making sections that correspond to different parts of Terron Beckham's life. I think the following articles could be good model articles to get ideas from: Tom Brady or Odell Beckham Jr..
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - The content added is almost up-to-date. For example, a small fix that needs to be made is on the Youtube infobox where it lists Beckham's total views. I think you meant to write 50.8 million views.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - I think you can definitely add to the "Early Life" section of your article. You can add information about Beckham's parents and upbringing. In the "Other Sports" section, you could expand on Beckham's experience in WWE. You could also try to find other activities Terron Beckham has participated in because compared to your other sections, this section is shorter than the others you have written.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? - No, it does not.

Tone and Balance

 * Is the content added neutral? - Yes, the majority of your article is in a neutral tone. There were only a few sentences where I thought it could be interpreted as biased.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? - The following sentence could be considered biased: "Nothing really materialized out of these workouts... " Another example is, "... his path to stardom could never transpire" (I italicized the phrases that made the sentence seem biased.). I think if you adjust these sentences then your article will be bias-free.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - I do not think you have overrepresented or underrepresented any viewpoints.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? - No, it does not. Since this article informs you on Terron Beckham's life and career, it does not seem like one side is favored over the other.

Sources and References

 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - From what I have seen, your content is supported by many sources. Some sentences even include two references, which helps build on the notability of your topic.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? - I think that your content reflects what your sources say. In the following link: https://www.stack.com/a/get-to-know-nfl-prospect-terron-beckham-the-freakishly-jacked-cousin-of-odell-beckham-jr/, you were able to paraphrase different aspects of Terron Beckham's life into concise sentences. For example, you said that he worked at GameStop to deal with his finances, and this aligns with what the source said too. I also see that Terron worked at Hollister and Best Buy to pay back some school loans, so maybe you could add that in.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? - I think your sources are thorough, but I think it will be helpful to find more sources similar to the ones you already have. If you find more sources talking about Terron Beckham's life and career, it will definitely help boost the notability of your article.
 * Are the sources current? - I would say that the sources are current because the years range from 2016 to present time.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? - The sources are all written by different authors, so there are many voices reporting on this individual and his accomplishments.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? - For this kind of article, I am not too sure if you will be able to find peer-reviewed articles. You can always trying using the OneSearch database: https://csu-sfsu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/search?vid=01CALS_SFR:01CALS_SFR&lang=en. In terms of the websites that you are using, double-check that they are not blogs.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? - All your links work!

Organization

 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - I think the information you have written so far is crystal clear and easy to follow along. Overall, everything makes sense to me.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - Every now and then, there are couple of grammar errors but that can be fixed in the editing stage. I think you should read your sentences aloud because that is the best way to spot mistakes.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? - I think your content is very well-organized. I think that what you wrote and what section you placed it in makes it so that everything in your article flows smoothly.

Images and Media

 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? - There are no images in this article, but since this article is on a person, I suggest you add an image of Terron Beckham. I think you should also add to the personal infobox that would go under his image.
 * Are images well-captioned? - Since you don't have any images just yet, I want to say that I think your infoboxes really make your article seem like a true Wikipedia page. Your infoboxes have lots of relevant details and I am sure you can continue adding to them.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? - N/a
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? - I think your infoboxes are visually appealing and makes your article stand out!

For New Articles Only

 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? - Yes, you have many sources that repeat the same information, which proves to me that the content you wrote is accurate.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? - I think you have a good list of sources at the moment, but I think you can find some more so that you can build on your sections, like the "Other Sports" heading.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? - Yes, your article definitely follows patterns of other athletes' Wikipedia pages. For example, many football players' wiki pages features the following section headings: their early life and professional career, and infoboxes that lists their pre-draft measurables, and personal information.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? - I think it does. Something that could make it more discoverable is adding that Odell Beckham is Terron's cousin.

Overall impressions

 * I think you have a strong lead section as you define your topic in one concise sentence and nicely summarize what your article is about. I think your section headings have a good amount of information that you can continue building on. You also have great infoboxes, which makes your article more interesting to read. Something that you could work on is finding more sources and trying to adjust sentences that seem bias. Overall, you did a very nice job!