User:DeLawZiuzia/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title Water law in the United States
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article provides a neutral overview of water law in the United States. It gives a lot of information without going too deep into the specfics. The article talks about various doctrine in water law. The article also describes various policies issues in the United States stemming from water law. This article gave me a good insight into water law because it opened up several channels for me to explore. It references many other more specific articles that I can get into. The article notes some equity gaps. The misrepresentation of indigenous individuals in water law.
 * Sources
 * University of Denver Water Law Review
 * Water Law
 * The Journal of Water Law
 * Water Law
 * The Journal of Water Law

Option 2

 * Article title Arizona v. California
 * Article Evaluation The article describes a set of cases concerning water distribution from the Colorado River. The article cites various judicial decisions and statutes in a neutral manner. The citations are not the strongest on the first page of this article as they link to buffalonews.
 * Sources
 * Lawrence Pratt Collection Concerning Arizona v. California and the Colorado River.
 * Sources
 * Lawrence Pratt Collection Concerning Arizona v. California and the Colorado River.

Option 3

 * Article title Winters v. United States
 * Article Evaluation This case decided in 1908 set the precedent for Native American rights to water in the United States. The article is mostly neutral. It provides a strong summary of the case facts and the procedural posture. The article then goes into the effect this decision had. The article does a good job with citations where necessary.
 * Sources
 * There are 29 different sources. Almost all are very strong.
 * Sources
 * There are 29 different sources. Almost all are very strong.

Option 4

 * Article title Wyoming v. Colorado
 * Article Evaluation The article does not have a lot of information. It looks like it has a good start. Some more details and sources could be added. There is not really enough factual background.
 * Sources
 * cites to case law
 * Sources
 * cites to case law

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources