User:De Pisan

I have successfully participated in the following WikiEdu courses training scholars in how to edit Wikipedia:


 * Wiki Scholars - National Archives and Records Administration 2019 Q1 (12 weeks, 10 students) [authored article on Carrie Langston Hughes turning her from a Woman in Red to a "woman in blue" as per the Redlist Index; this article appeared in the April 4, 2019 Wikipedia "Did You Know?" post, see below]
 * National Archives Wiki Scholars - Advanced May 2019 (4 weeks, 7 students) [contributed significantly to article on the Nineteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution now rated as a Wikipedia Social Sciences and Society "Good Article" reviewed on December 18, 2019]
 * Women in Red Wiki Scholars - Spring 2020 (12 weeks, 22 students) [authored article on Mammoth Bioscience's co-founder Janice Chen and added Gay Magazine and Unruly Bodies to Roxane Gay's page. Chen appeared on Wikipedia's Women in Red Redlist Index, Gay Magazine appeared on the June 2020 Women in Red editing event, "Pride"]

Additional edits include:

April-May, 2021 - Authored article on Hot Wells of Bexar County

July 27, 2020 - Added subsection, "Queering suffragist history," to the article on the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Response on the talk page re: taking section down:

Problems with 'queering suffragist history'[edit]

First issue - this was not an article for Ms. Magazine, it was a reprint of an article by the Women’s Suffrage Centennial Commission; it shouldn't be attributed to the former. The section is WP:UNDUE, it has only the one source - it should instead pull in sourced portions from within the original article. It's also not providing background to the movement per se, it's an interpretation of the personal behaviors of some of the people involved in it. It relies too heavily on the one author's perspective and narrative. I can certainly see some of the more direct details being incorporated into the biographies of those mentioned, and those details may be relevant to their inclusion in the suffragist background of the nineteenth amendment, but not as a standalone section, it would require wider acknowledgement of these interpretations in other reliable sources. Anastrophe (talk) 19:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)