User:DeanMoir/sandbox


 * Article Evaluation on Architectural analytics
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Every thing is the article pertains to the topic but the actual is lacking is length information and they have no sources
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? None of the information is out of date there is just a lack of information
 * What else could be improved? More research and examples on the topic backed up with accredited sources explaining the topic
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There are not any claims at all the article is lacking in many areas
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The only view point in the article is the definition nothing else
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? This article has no citations
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? This article has no sources it needs sources to back it up along with examples that portray the concept to the reader
 * ~DeanMoir

I understand that this article is very set in stone that is one of my concerns and I will be adding a entire section of the article designated to a few of the other types of people and illustrate to that not everyone will fall under these specific categories, and some people will have attributes from many. DeanMoir (talk) 23:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)