User:Deashiaterrell

/Article evaluation - (Human) Suffering
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Yes, everything in the article is relevant because it provides background about the history of human suffering.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, the article draws from various sources and I did not detect any bias.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No, everything is clearly and distinctly represented.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Yes the links work and the sources support the claims made in the article.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * All of the facts appear to be reliable and appropriate. The information comes from books other credible educational materials.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * No, the information is very thorough.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There has been discussion about how to improve the article.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * It is a level 4 vital article and it was the subject of an educational assignment.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * The article is more explicit and delves into the types of mistreatment people encounter as a result of being stripped of their human rights.