User:Debolaz/Badfaith

Users I've encountered that I suspect are not editing articles in good faith. I'll try to document the reasons why I believe this to be the case as carefully as I can. The things I look for are:


 * Editing for a position that would obviously benefit someone commercially.
 * Have few notable edits outside the subject in question.
 * Refusal to spend time to debate the issue rationally, instead constantly editing their desired changes back in.

All these must be true for someone to be listed on this page.

User:TheChode

 * Prefers to edit anonymously from the 203.164.0.0 - 203.164.31.255 (An australian ISP)
 * Constantly removed S.T.A.L.K.E.R. from List of vaporware despite this being a referenced entry.
 * All notable edits has been to this article and related pages.
 * Eventually accused me of having some sort of business interest in keeping S.T.A.L.K.E.R. on the list, which I suspect the the purpose any making possible later accusations against him sound like revenge. (No such accusations were made against him at the time, listing him here is now the first time I've formally made such a claim)
 * Vandalised my user page.
 * Removed himself from this page.
 * Blanked his talk page so people wouldn't see the vandalism warnings I had put there.

User:JULEBRYG

 * Edited the Fleshlight article, adding market-speech to it.
 * All notable edits has been to this article and related pages.
 * Fleshlight (The company) is notorious for this.