User:Dec7205/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Case law

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is applicable to the class, and the article itself isn't too developed. The article acts as a "groundwork" article that is meant to lead to more developed topics. My preliminary impression was that the article is slightly under developed and could use more information.

Evaluate the article
The Case law article itself is very neutral, it doesn't directly line itself with any political party or country, but rather gives avenues to more specific case law articles along with giving a simple background on the subject. The Case Law article is underdeveloped, and a few other subcategories can be added (such as case law by country). Aside from being underdeveloped, the article is well written and organized to the expectations of any other wikipedia article. The article features a limited number of pictures and media, but that is expected with blanket articles like this.

Moving away from the main article page, the articles talk page does have a few entries which range from questions about case law in general to cleanup notes for the main page. I think this shows that the article has been combed through in the past for errors and the information is being kept up to date (where applicable).

Looking at the reference section, all of the listed references are all reliable, with the only fault of the section being a limited number of references. The references have also been written by numerous editors, rather than just one person.

My final impression of the article is that it does what its needed to do, more information would not necessarily make it "better" but more information can be added along with more subcategories in order to condense more information about case law into one place. I would say as my final verdict that the article is underdeveloped, but not incomplete or poorly written.